Kim Dotcom’s Extradition Battle Suffers High Court Setback

In 2012, file-hosting site Megaupload was shut down by the United States government and founder Kim Dotcom and his associates were arrested in New Zealand.

Ever since, the US government has sought to extradite Dotcom on several counts including copyright infringement, racketeering, and money laundering. Dotcom has fought them every single step of the way.

One of the key areas of conflict has been the validity of the search warrants used to raid his Coatesville home on January 20, 2012. The fight has been meticulous and lengthy but in 2014, following appeals to lower courts, the Supreme Court finally dismissed Dotcom’s appeals that the search warrants weren’t valid.

Following a three-month hearing, the District Court later found that Dotcom was eligible for extradition. Dotcom appealed again but in February 2017 the High Court ruled that the entrepreneur could indeed be transferred to the United States.

Dotcom subsequently appealed the High Court decision to the Court of Appeal, a hearing that will go ahead in February 2018. Last summer, the Megaupload founder also “attacked the underpinnings of the extradition process” by filing an eight-point statement of claim for judicial review. This morning the High Court handed down its decision and it looks like bad news for Dotcom

The causes of action presented by the Megaupload founder were varied but began by targeting the validity of the arrest warrants used in January 2012 and by extension every subsequent process, including the extradition effort itself.

“Accordingly, the relief sought includes orders that the extradition proceeding be quashed or set aside and that Mr Dotcom be discharged,” the ruling reads.

However, the Court describes this argument as an abuse of process, noting that the Supreme Court has already upheld the validity of the search warrants and a High Court ruling confirmed the District Court’s finding that Dotcom is eligible for extradition, a process that will soon head to the Court of Appeal.

But Dotcom’s arguments continued, with attacks on the validity of search warrants and a request to quash them and return all property seized under their authority. Another point asserted that a US request to seize Dotcom’s assets in New Zealand was invalid because no extraditable offense had been committed.

Unfortunately for Dotcom, none of his detailed arguments gained traction with the Hight Court. In his decision, Justice Timothy Brewer sides with the US government which previously described the efforts as “collateral attacks on previous decisions of the Courts and an attempt to pre-empt Mr Dotcom’s appeal.”

The Judge eventually rejected seven out of the eight causes of action in a 22-page ruling (pdf) published this morning.

“I have granted the USA’s application to strike out causes of action 1 to 7 of the statement of claim for judicial review dated 21 July 2017. The proceeding is now ‘live’ only in relation to the eighth cause of action,” Justice Brewer writes.

“I direct that the proceeding be listed for mention in relation to the eighth cause of action in the duty list at 10:00 am on 7 February 2018.”

The eighth point, which wasn’t challenged by the US, concerns the “decision by the Deputy Solicitor-General in June 2017 to direct that clones be made of the electronic devices seized from Mr Dotcom’s homes and that they be sent to the USA.”

A few minutes ago, Dotcom took to Twitter with an apparent upbeat reference to the ruling.

Like all things Dotcom, the show won’t be over until every last stone has been unturned. Next stop, Court of Appeal in February.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN discounts, offers and coupons

from TorrentFreak Click Here for full article

The Difference Between iPhone X VS. iPhone 8

The latest iPhone release is iPhone X. It is one of the most interesting Apple’s mobiles phones. It was released at the beginning of November but is still making popular noise on the internet. Everyone is talking about its cool features, it’s amazing power and the most important, its dual camera. The new camera of iPhone X is just amazing. It comes with a 12 megapixels dual camera system which provides high-resolution images in different formats. While everyone is talking about iPhone X, there is a bit noise about iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus. Although the latest release is iPhone X, yet the value of iPhone 8 is still solid. There is a bit difference between iPhone 8 and iPhone X.

When iPhone X was launched, there were some many similarities between iPhone X and iPhone 8. That’s why people started searching for the internet similarities and differences between iPhone X and iPhone 8. Today, we will help you to find out what are the main differences between iPhone 8 and iPhone X. we will briefly compare every feature and function between these two devices.

Performance: Chipset and RAM

The first thing to consider is the performance of both of these devices. iPhone 8 and iPhone X both have Apple A11 Bionic chipset with six cores of CPU and six cores of GPU. This CPU architecture allows the iPhone users to experience extremely fast and smooth processes running on the iPhone. You can enjoy multitasking in a smooth process which will give you the best of the mobile experience. On the other hand, iPhone 8 has 2GB of RAM, and iPhone X has 3GB of RAM. iPhone X has a little benefit of 3GB RAM, but it has more resources that are used by RAM. It means it has a more powerful screen and a dual camera which will take more memory as compared to a small screen and a single lens camera. So the performance of these devices is almost same.

Display: Screen size

The second feature is the screen size of both of the devices. The iPhone 8 has 4.7 inches True Tone LCD screen with 1334×750 pixels while iPhone X has 5.8 inches True Tone OLED screen with 2436×1125 pixels. The iPhone 8 has a smaller screen and is more comfortable for indoor and outdoor uses. On the other hand, iPhone X is designed to have an enhanced mobile experience with a larger screen with more pixels.

Camera

The most important feature of iPhone 8 and iPhone X is the camera. The iPhone 8 Plus and iPhone X have a 12 megapixels camera. However, iPhone 8 comes with single lens camera while iPhone X comes with dual lens camera. The performance of both of the devices is identical, but iPhone X has some benefits for the dual camera. It allows getting better photos with more light and picture enhancements.

Battery life

Another great feature of iPhone X and iPhone 8 is the battery life. iPhone X has more battery power and performance as compared to iPhone 8. Both of the devices are fast charge capable of charging speed up to 50% charge in just 30 minutes. The only contrast between these two devices is iPhone X has 21 hours of talk time while iPhone 8 has 14 hours of talk time.

Both of these devices are identical. There are some minor upgrades in the new iPhone X, but there is a large difference between the prices of these two devices.

The post The Difference Between iPhone X VS. iPhone 8 appeared first on TechWorm.

from TechWorm Click Here for full article

Japanese researcher discovers a new optical illusion called ‘curvature blindness’

This new optical illusion makes curvy lines appear zig-zagged

Kohske Takahashi, a cognition and illusion researcher at Chukyo University, Japan has shared a new optical illusion online that will blow your mind and make one think that we should not perceive based on what we see.

The illusion dubbed as “curvature blindness” is described and explained in the journal i-Perception, which provides scientific breakdown and analysis of the optical illusion. It describes how a wavy line can be perceived as a zigzag line on a white, grey and black background.

“Here, we report a novel illusion —— Curvature Blindness Illusion —— that will provide novel implications for contour perception, in particular, for the underlying mechanisms of curve and corner perception,” Takahashi wrote.

In the image below, which displays the illusion, one can see pairs of wavy lines and pairs of zigzag lines against a grey background. Despite how they appear, all the lines are exactly the same.

Japanese researcher discovers a new optical illusion called ‘curvature blindness’

The lines in the top left and bottom right corner when viewed against the grey background appear curvy like sine waves, while those with the grey background appear to have a sharper zig-zag-like pattern. However, a closer look at the grey background reveals that the curved, dark lines that are running from top to bottom appear to carry the zig-zag pattern, although they are curved in reality.

In simpler words, the image consists of light and dark grey dashes linked to make parallel lines in waves and zig-zags on a white, grey and black background. But in reality, the zig-zags don’t actually exist.

“Physically, however, all lines are wavy lines with an identical shape; there is no triangular wave and hence there is no corner,” Takahashi said.

“Despite the simplicity and effect magnitudes, to the best of our knowledge, no one has reported about this phenomenon.”

It’s unclear exactly why human brain perceive the zigzag contour as a sharp corner.

According to Takahashi, when our brains are confused and there is ambiguity over whether a line is a smooth curve or not, it is easy for the brains to see corners rather than curves our brains.

“We propose that the underlying mechanisms for the gentle curve perception and those of obtuse corner perception are competing with each other in an imbalanced way and the percepts of a corner might be dominant in the visual system,” Takahashi explained.

“As the effect magnitudes are quite strong, unless one carefully stares at the region that looks like a corner, it is hard to find that all lines are physically wavy,” added Takahashi.

The post Japanese researcher discovers a new optical illusion called ‘curvature blindness’ appeared first on TechWorm.

from TechWorm Click Here for full article

1.4 Billion Plain-Text Credentials Leaked On The Dark Web

Searchable database of unencrypted usernames and passwords available online

Security experts have found a 41-gigabyte (GB) archive containing over 1.4 billion unencrypted user credentials on the Dark Web, which had been updated at the end of November.

The huge database consisting over 1.4 billion email addresses, passwords, and other credentials in plain text was discovered online on December 5 by security researchers from the California-based identity threat intelligence company, 4iQ. The file found is not the result of a new data breach, but an amalgamation of those from several past breaches, collated into a single database that is over 41GB in size.

According to Julio Casal, 4iQ founder and chief technology officer, the archive is the most massive aggregation of various leaks that’s ever been found in the Dark Web until date.

While scanning the deep and dark web for stolen, leaked or lost data, 4iQ discovered a single file with a database of 1.4 billion clear text credentials — the largest aggregate database found in the dark web to date.” reads a post published by 4iQ on Medium.

“None of the passwords are encrypted, and what’s scary is the we’ve tested a subset of these passwords and most of the have been verified to be true.”

The 41GB file aggregates data from a collection of over 250 previous data breaches and credential lists, which include popular websites such as LinkedIn, Netflix, Last.FM, MySpace, Zoosk, and YouPorn, as well as games like Minecraft and Runescape.

The data was organized and indexed alphabetically by the collector, and the total amount of credentials is 1,400,553,869.

“The breach is almost two times larger than the previous largest credential exposure, the Exploit.in combo list that exposed 797 million records.” continues Julio Casal.

“This new breach adds 385 million new credential pairs, 318 million unique users, and 147 million passwords pertaining to those previous dumps.”

An extensive examination of the archive gave researchers a glimpse of some of the most commonly used weak passwords by the users, which includes passwords such as “123456,” “123456789,” “qwerty,” “password,” and “111111.”

While some of the breaches happened a few years ago, expert observed that the cybercriminals still have good chances of accessing personal accounts as users tend to reuse the easy and common passwords or the same passwords for multiple online services.

“Since the data is alphabetically organized, the massive problem of password reuse — — same or very similar passwords for different accounts — — appears constantly and is easily detectable.” states the post.

The researchers highlighted that 14% of the 1.4 billion records (almost 200 million) had not previously been available in readily-usable decrypted form. In other words, the passwords and usernames, were new and in plain text.

“We compared the data with the combination of two larger clear text exposures, aggregating the data from Exploit.in and Anti Public. This new breach adds 385 million new credential pairs, 318 million unique users, and 147 million passwords pertaining to those previous dumps.” continues the expert.

While it is unclear who is behind the collection of billions of user credentials, the culprits have however left the Bitcoin and Dogecoin wallet addresses accessible for anyone who wants to donate for their alleged efforts.

In order to stay safe from potential cyber-attacks, we recommend our readers to use strong passwords, avoid using same passwords on multiple sites, and regularly keep changing your passwords.

Source: securityaffairs

The post 1.4 Billion Plain-Text Credentials Leaked On The Dark Web appeared first on TechWorm.

from TechWorm Click Here for full article

FCC Repeals U.S. Net Neutrality Rules

In recent months, millions of people have protested the FCC’s plan to repeal U.S. net neutrality rules, which were put in place by the Obama administration.

However, an outpouring public outrage, critique from major tech companies, and even warnings from pioneers of the Internet, had no effect.

Today the FCC voted to repeal the old rules, effectively ending net neutrality.

Under the net neutrality rules that have been in effect during recent years, ISPs were specifically prohibited from blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization of “lawful” traffic. In addition, Internet providers could be regulated as carriers under Title II.

Now that these rules have been repealed, Internet providers have more freedom to experiment with paid prioritization. Under the new guidelines, they can charge customers extra for access to some online services, or throttle certain types of traffic.

Most critics of the repeal fear that, now that the old net neutrality rules are in the trash, ‘fast lanes’ for some services, and throttling for others, will become commonplace in the U.S.

This could also mean that BitTorrent traffic becomes a target once again. After all, it was Comcast’s ‘secretive’ BitTorrent throttling that started the broader net neutrality debate, now ten years ago.

Comcast’s throttling history is a sensitive issue, also for the company itself.

Before the Obama-era net neutrality rules, the ISP vowed that it would no longer discriminate against specific traffic classes. Ahead of the FCC vote yesterday, it doubled down on this promise.

“Despite repeated distortions and biased information, as well as misguided, inaccurate attacks from detractors, our Internet service is not going to change,” writes David Cohen, Comcast’s Chief Diversity Officer.

“We have repeatedly stated, and reiterate today, that we do not and will not block, throttle, or discriminate against lawful content.”

It’s worth highlighting the term “lawful” in the last sentence. It is by no means a promise that pirate sites won’t be blocked.

As we’ve highlighted in the past, blocking pirate sites was already an option under the now-repealed rules. The massive copyright loophole made sure of that. Targeting all torrent traffic is even an option, in theory.

That said, today’s FCC vote certainly makes it easier for ISPs to block or throttle BitTorrent traffic across the entire network. For the time being, however, there are no signs that any ISPs plan to do so.

If they do, we will know soon enough. The FCC requires all ISPs to be transparent under the new plan. They have to disclose network management practices, blocking efforts, commercial prioritization, and the like.

And with the current focus on net neutrality, ISPs are likely to tread carefully, or else they might just face an exodus of customers.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN discounts, offers and coupons

from TorrentFreak Click Here for full article

How To Start Mobile Penetration for iOS

iOS applications like better out-of-the-box security than their Android alternatives due to Apple’s much more tightly controlled environment. Nevertheless, that advantage does not mean much in case you do not perform a thorough job securing the apps of yours.

That is the reason there has to be somebody who assumes the job of penetration tester on each team. The info below highlights the appropriate topics in Apple’s iOS Security Guide and OWASP’s Mobile Security Testing Guide. It can serve as a very helpful cheatsheet for starting up penetration testing for iOS apps.

Preparing the assessment environment

An important component of dog pen testing an iOS software will be the usage of the appropriate tools and devices. You will find numerous different tools.

App logic

The first and most significant action is usually to completely evaluate the app’s flow and entry data points, which includes how and where the information is kept in the unit or perhaps transmitted to APIs.

Applying a testing framework

Before you apply an assessment program, you want an obvious method in place. For a place to start, I suggest creating your technique around the OWASP Mobile Top ten.

OWASP suggests you begin by breaking down the ten vulnerabilities into specific tests which could be categorized into one or even much more of these sections. Additionally, you are able to develop specific tests targeting the range of every section.

Specific iOS security concerns

The iOS platform has very specific security concerns when analyzing the vulnerabilities of apps.

Checking for insecure data storage

Data can be stored in different formats including (but not limited to):

  • The NSUserDefaults class
  • Log files
  • XML and plist
  • SQLite files
  • Keychain data

Capturing the traffic with ZAP or BURP

You are able to make use of BURP of OWASP ZAP as an assault proxy to gain all of the visitors between the app plus its outside connections. This tutorial shows you exactly how to configure OWASP ZAP to intercept all traffic. BURP has specific guidelines to setup the proxy in this situation. Its configuration has an iOS simulator.

When you begin capturing the site traffic, you are able to work with active or passive scanning on each proxies for particular strikes to APIs being called by the app. In case the software is employing SSL certificate pinning, you may wish to try bypassing SSL Pinning by utilizing SSL Kill switch on the iPhone device. In case this doesn’t work, you should most likely try to reverse the application to discover the actual implementation. You are able to accomplish this by utilizing Frida or maybe Cydia to avoid certificate pinning at runtime.

Reversing the application

Among the OWASP Top ten Mobile vulnerability listings recommends you learn just how “reversible” your application is. iOS programs are, by default, significantly tougher to reverse than Android, though it is certainly possible. Think about taking a look at several of the suggested resources for ios reverse engineering.

The post How To Start Mobile Penetration for iOS appeared first on TechWorm.

from TechWorm Click Here for full article

CEEK Launches Token Sale to Connect Artists and Fans In VR

Artists and content creators in the entertainment industry are passing up on potential revenue due to their inability to reach a huge part of the global audience. Despite the innovation and extended reach of VR technology, many potential participants are still sidelined from playing a part in the entertainment industry, especially as fans and followers.

VR in the entertainment industry

With concerts repeatedly sold-out and audience demands most often beyond the capacity of available physical arenas, the limitations of the current state of the entertainment industry is further exposed. However, the technology that simulates the actual environment, making viewers from thousand of kilometers and continents away enjoy the aura of a given event has gone a long way in making a global community out of the real world.

The VR technology effectively simulates the communal experience of attending a live concert, a sporting event, educational classroom, e.t.c, from anywhere at anytime.

CEEK Launches Token Sale to Connect Artists and Fans In VRCEEK and the blockchain

CEEK is taking innovation in the entertainment industry a step further by the implementation of blockchain technology and its token sale. This enables artists and celebrities to “mint” coins that are attached to contents, therefore creating virtual event tickets and merchandise which in turn makes possible an unlimited revenue stream.

Celebrity minted coins and virtual merchandise items take on the traits of cryptocurrency as each are assigned their own Ethereum address, therefore offer fans the ability to cash in by owning rare items that can gain in value very quickly in virtual reality. Artists may sign these items with special cryptographic token signatures that cannot be duplicated and are authenticated on the blockchain as to their rarity and value.

The platform will be powered by tokens using the ERC20 Adapter and will be Bancor Smart Tokens, allowing them to connect to the Bancor network. A Bancor Token Converter can be launched for each smart token with a CEEK reserve using a configurable “weight”. Once the tokens are minted, the total number of custom tokens may fluctuate and the price will dynamically adjust based on market sentiment and demand.

CEEK Launches Token Sale to Connect Artists and Fans In VR

Blockchain technology for industrial enhancement

By implementing blockchain technology, there is an enhancement of the industry as a whole. Global reach becomes automatically simplified since the characteristics of the blockchain platform remains universal in every part of the world. The platform will remove the hurdles of creating premium content and virtual goods featuring licensed music and celebrity assets by offering clearing house services through Smart Contracts that automatically pay respective rights holders and publishers.

The technology will also enable a growing ecosystem of world class partners who are using the CEEK Platform to scale existing 2D content into virtual reality, as well as creating and distributing uniquely original experiences.

The network is in late-stage discussions and have upcoming releases with Oculus VR, Disney Music, Fox Studios, World Of Dance, leading award shows, sports teams, brands, festivals, over 30 labels, studios, and mobile carriers. Additionally, CEEK is partnering with Universities and Hospitals to offer educational programming.

The post CEEK Launches Token Sale to Connect Artists and Fans In VR appeared first on TechWorm.

from TechWorm Click Here for full article

Canadian Government Triggers Major Copyright Review

The Copyright Act of Canada was first passed in 1921 and in the decades that followed has undergone considerable amendment.

Between 2005 and 2010, several bills failed to gain traction due to opposition but in 2011 the Copyright Modernization Act was tabled. A year later, in the summer of 2012, it was passed into law.

The Act tackles a number of important issues, such as allowing time and format shifting, plus backup copies, as long as DRM isn’t circumvented along the way. So-called ‘fair dealing’ also enjoys expansion while statutory damages for non-commercial scale infringement are capped at CAD$5000 per proceeding. Along with these changes sits the “notice-and-notice” regime, in which ISPs forward infringement notices to subscribers on behalf of copyright holders.

The Act also mandates a review of copyright law every five years, a period that expired at the end of June 2017. Yesterday a House of Commons motion triggered the required parliamentary review, which will be carried out by the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology. It didn’t take long for the music industry to make its position known.

Music Canada, whose key members are Sony Music, Universal Music and Warner Music, enthusiastically welcomed the joint announcement from the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development and the Minister of Canadian Heritage.

“I applaud Minister Bains and Minister Joly for initiating this review of the Copyright Act,” said Graham Henderson, President and CEO of Music Canada.

“Music creators, and all creators who depend on copyright, deserve a Copyright Act that protects their rights when their works are commercialized by others. This is our chance to address the Value Gap threatening the livelihood of Canadian creators and the future of Canadian culture.”

That the so-called “Value Gap” has been immediately thrown on the table comes as no surprise. The term, which loosely refers to the way user-generated platforms like YouTube are able to avoid liability for infringing content while generating revenue from it, is a hot topic around the world at the moment.

In the US and Europe, for example, greater emphasis is being placed on YouTube’s position than on piracy itself, with record labels claiming that the platform gains an unfair advantage in licensing negotiations, something which leads to a “gap” between what is paid for music, and what it’s actually worth.

But the recording labels are unlikely to get an easy ride. As pointed out in a summary by Canadian law professor Michael Geist, the notice-and-takedown rules that facilitate the “Value Gap” are not even part of Canadian law and even without them, the labels have done just fine.

“The industry has enjoyed remarkable success since 2012, growing far faster [than] the world average and passing Australia as the world’s 6th largest music market,” Geist writes.

“The growth has come largely through Internet streaming revenues, which now generate tens of millions of dollars every year for creators, publishers, and the broader industry. The industry is also likely to continue to lobby for copyright term extension, as foreshadowed by a lobbying blitz just last month in Ottawa.”

As reported in September, telecoms companies and the entertainment industries are pressing for website blockades, without intervention from the courts. The upcoming copyright review will provide additional opportunity to push that message home.

“Bell admits that copyright reform is not needed for site blocking, but the link to the Copyright Act ensures that the issue will be a prominent part of its lobbying campaign,” Geist notes.

“The reality is that Canada is already home to some of the toughest anti-piracy laws in the world with many legislative tools readily available for rights holders and some of the largest damages provisions found anywhere in the world.”

But for copyright holders, a review also has the potential to swing things the other way.

The previously mentioned notice-and-notice regime, for example, was put in place as an alternative to more restrictive schemes elsewhere. However, it was quickly abused by copyright trolls seeking cash settlements from alleged pirates. It’s certainly possible for that particular loophole to be closed or at least addressed as part of a comprehensive review.

In any event, the review is likely to prove spirited, with interested parties on all sides trying to carve out a smooth path for their interests under the next five years of copyright law.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN discounts, offers and coupons

from TorrentFreak Click Here for full article

15 Best HookUp Sites That Work Like A Charm

We found this really funny, yet interesting quote on the world wide web today. It goes like, “A random hookup is like a half eaten sandwich in the fridge; you don’t know who ate it last, but you know that it’s 2 am and you’re hungry”; true, isn’t it? The society might frown upon this new-age concept but let’s be honest, things aren’t always black or white in the real world. Sometimes you just do not feel ready for commitment. As long as you’re candid about it, casual relationships are harmless.

That said, finding a partner to date is not as simple as ABC; but online dating services have changed the whole game, for the better. The internet is swamped with such websites! The difficult part is to root out the best ones as not all of them are legit. That’s exactly what this article is about. We’ve prepared a list of the best hookup sites after using them personally. Recently, we have also shared some hookup apps.

Top 15 Best HookUp Sites To Try Out 2018!

OKCupid:

Unlike majority of the dating apps available these days, OKcupid’s focus lies on getting to know a person for real rather than matching merely on basis of a picture. In fact, this is clear in their slogan as well which says, “Substance, not selfie”. You can either sign-up via Facebook or enter your details such as your name, birthdate, location, and email address. Once you’ve signed in, OKcupid will ask you a few intriguing questions to know you better which in turn will help you discover like-minded people. Moreover, it’ll also display the level of match-rate on a person’s profile so you’ll know if you two would get along or not, based on your interests. Note that this site not only facilitates casual dating but is also targeted at those who’re looking for a more meaningful connection.

Tinder:

tinder

Tinder is so popular that perhaps even your parents know about it. This site works on a swiping-format for the purpose of matching. What’s best about Tinder is that it is has an extremely straightforward interface, making it quite user-friendly. After logging in, you’ll be shown profiles, one at a time. You may either swipe left (if you aren’t interested) or swipe right (if you like a profile) based on their pictures. If there is a mutual match, meaning that the other person has also swiped right on you, then you can start chatting. The reason why we’ve listed it after OKcupid is because Tinder does not allow users to sign-in without Facebook. While you may see this as a good measure (for the sake of authenticity), its also bad because those without a Facebook account have no other way of joining Tinder. You may also like how to use Tinder without Facebook.

Coffee Meets Bagel:

The Coffee Meets Bagel site/app looks as cute as it sounds. Unfortunately, it never received the same hype as Tinder but we can confidently say that you would love using this service. In case you’re wondering about the origin of its name, the service has a unique concept wherein coffee beans are referred to as the currency used on the platform and bagels are basically match-suggestions (one per day) given to users. The coffee beans can be earned through several activities, including signing in. Though it works quite similar to the two sites mentioned above, it is different in that – A) Only women can make the first move so if you’re a guy, you cannot send a message unless your match does. B) You’ll be given only a day to decide whether to like or pass a bagel (match) and only 8 days to begin talking, after which your chat would disappear and you’ll have to start all over again. This is effective in our opinion since it promotes the importance of meeting in person rather than carrying on with a virtual relationship.

FriendFinder-X:

FriendFinder-X is aimed at those who’re just looking for some fun; be it while traveling or in their own city. Currently, the site has about two million active users who are not only encouraged to express their deepest desires but also bring them to fruition. Members can share pictures and videos, and even chat using a live-webcam feature similar to any video-calling app. There are other features as well including daily horoscope, ratings on pictures based on hotness, e-greeting cards, etc. While you can join the site for free, it does require you to subscribe to a paid monthly plan (either silver or gold). FriendFinder-X is quite a good hook-up site especially if you’re seeking cyber-sex; but its important to note that they do acquire personal data as soon as you sign-up. This enables them to spread around your information legally and you may not even find out, so beware!

Zoosk:

Launched a decade ago, Zoosk has an even bigger user-base of about 35 million members comprising of both, heterosexuals and homosexuals. With so many users, you’re sure to get a good deal of matches. What’s more? You can chat with fellow-members in about 20 different languages by using the relevant filter so if you’re not fluent in English, no worries! Caveat: Zoosk does not permit you to contact a user you like unless you purchase Zoosk coins for which you’ll have to subscribe to the paid plan. However, the paid plan does include many unique features like SmartPick and check who viewed your profile. This service has a snappy interface both, on web as well as mobile app. Setting up a profile is fairly easy too! All you’ve got to do is key in your personal details such as birthdate, location, preferences (for dating), answer a few questions, and you’re good to go.

Match.com:

Established way back in 1995, Match.com is perhaps the oldest online dating service on this list. And when a company has been around for such a long time, you know it means quality. The service can be enjoyed in about 25 nations and quite obviously, has millions of members. Although it can be used for hooking up, it also caters to those who’re looking for real love. The sign-up process takes longer than others but that’s because Match.com focuses on extracting as many details about their users as possible. You’ll be asked to fill sections like “About Me”, “About My Match”, and “In My Own Words”. These are basically to know about your lifestyle, likes/dislikes, values, background, and physical appearance; thus assuring more suitable matches. Nevertheless, if you don’t want to put too many details out there, you could simply leave it blank.

Plenty of Fish:

A service that is really well-known in Canada, Plenty of Fish boasts of gaining a whopping 70,000 new members everyday with more than 4 million daily sign-ins. You can sign-up by entering details such as your birthdate, gender, country, ethnicity, and email address. Additionally, you could also take the POF “Relationship Chemistry Predictor” that helps in measuring one’s personality, thus finding better potential matches. Other than this, there’s no matching algorithm as such. Instead, users are allowed to set filters and discover profiles. Similar to Match.com, Plenty of Fish, or POF, also let’s members connect in search different needs such as a serious relationship, friendship, or dating. However, it curves more towards the “hooking-up” segment so if that’s what you’re looking for, go ahead and check it out.

Adult Friend Finder:

With a tag line that says, “Hookup, Find Sex, or Meet Someone Hot Now”, you can tell what Adult Friend Finder offers right away. Self-proclaimed as the “World’s Largest Sex & Swinger Community”, this service currently features over 800 live broadcasts, 90 million+ hot pictures, and a user-base of more than 4 million. It’s forthright purpose saves you the time and effort taken to filter out profiles or state your intention. All you have to do is sign-up (for free), and get started. Although you can browse through profiles and find potential matches for flings, Adult Friend Finder also has a considerable number of models/members who go live so if you get a little randy, you know what to do. Fun fact: this site was launched almost two decades ago! That means that you might come across many inactive profiles. Nevertheless, you wouldn’t be disappointed with the overall experience.

Ashley Madison:

Ashley Madison is yet another online dating site which is largely popular in Canada with over 50 million users. Strange as it may sound, the service is chiefly angled at married or committed people (who aren’t happy in their relationships) looking to have an affair. In other words, Ashley Madison facilitates extra marital affairs. Even if yourself aren’t hitched, you could meet men or women who are married. Whether it is just for the thrill or curiosity or out of a sincere yearning for spark, this site is sure to fulfil all your needs. The only drawback is that getting a match is not as quick and easy as on other sites mentioned here. That’s because like it or not, infidelity is more common in men than women. That said, we don’t encourage you to cheat or hurt anyone; but every case is unique and if you have strong reasons for resorting to a service such as this, feel free to use it.

Pure:

Want to have some casual fun but too worried about privacy intrusion? Well, Pure’s aim is to ensure just that. The way it works is that you can register an account with them and fill it in with your personal details. Once you have a mutual match, you’re allowed to chat with the person for up to 60 minutes. After that, not only your chat window, but your entire profile itself will be gone from the platform. A 1-hour window minimizes the risk of data exposure. Moreover, it pushes you to engage in a conversation (mostly intimate) rather than delaying the act and defeating the purpose of the service. Even if you really like the person and wish to take it forward, you’ll have to exchange your contact details within the one-hour timeframe. Pure promotes quick sexual/casual talks without worrying about calling, meeting, or texting them after.

SaucyDates:

Similar to Adult Friend Finder, SaucyDates was also created to let users connect with other singles seeking a relationship with no strings. The website has about 3 million users and claims to offer complete identity protection as they do not sell personal data (including pictures) on search engines. Joining the SaucyDates community is absolutely free and in fact, you can even look up VIP members without shelling a dime. However, to avail premium features, you would need to upgrade to a paid membership; as is the case with most dating services. What’s more? SaucyDates is accessible from any part of the world. Having said that, you’re more likely to find a casual partner in urban regions/ Tier 1 countries.

Passion.com:

If you’re really passionate about finding a partner who’ll add some flare to your personal life, definitely try using this site. You can discover members on basis of location and other factors such as gender and pictures. As far as the member database goes, it presently has about 50 million users out of which at least a hundred thousand are online at any given time. Heads Up: You can join Passion.com for free but in order to chat with fellow members, you’ll have to subscribe to the Gold Membership. Once you opt for that, you’ll be able to send emails, messages, participate in group video-calls, and also check out Passion’s cam models. Furthermore, your membership will also enable you to check out other details such as the profile picture and bio. The good news is that this service offers a three months’ free membership if you fail to meet a member within three months!

OasisActive:

OasisActive is specifically aimed at those who live in Australia. If you live anywhere else, you can skip this because profiles in other regions could simply be fake. The service was introduced in 2008 with an intention of facilitating pursuance of long-term relationships but today, you can also find casual dates just to hook up. Similar to OKcupid, you can register either through Facebook or feed in your details such as your gender and sexual orientation. As of now, it has a membership base of only 10 million but the site claims that there are approximately three hundred thousand log-ins daily. One downside that we noticed is that getting a date on this site is comparatively slower than others listed here. That said, the best part about this site is that you can see who is nearby and interact with others at no cost!

Badoo:

Badoo sports an excellent user interface and an eye-popping user-base of roughly three hundred sixty-eight million users. The service mentions “Meet New People” in its tag-line, which kind of suggests all sorts of relationships including friends. Nonetheless, the platform is flooded with people who’re only gunning for some fun. Badoo is free of cost in the real sense; in that you can sign-up, contact other users, and browse unlimited profiles without upgrading to any premium plans. Registration is quite easy. You can either log-in through your Facebook account or use other accounts on platforms like MSN, Yandex, Vkontakte, or Mail.ru. Alternatively, you may just key in your details and preferences including gender, what you’re looking for (whether to casually chat, make friends, or date), name, birthdate, and location. Once that’s set up, you can heart/cross on profiles of nearby users.

Find Rich Guys:

The concept of “Sugar daddies” is not alien to us. FindRichGuys is a niche dating service that caters to the aforementioned segment so if you’re into it, this could be your holy grail. The biggest pro of the site is that all the features, including the premium ones, can be enjoyed for free upon sign-up. Other sites charge a bomb even to register yourself as a member. However, this is also the site’s biggest con. Why you ask? Well, premium membership fee translates into filtered profiles and hence, a much safer and secured platform. All that aside, this service is for you if you’re in search of a Sugardaddy/Sugarbaby and don’t want to spend much on a dating service.

Conclusion:

Weeding out only 15 online hook-up sites from like 40,000 of them was quite a tall order. However, we’ve tried to put out the best ones on parameters like target audience, intent, accessibility, features, interface, user-base, frequency of ads, and popularity. Let us warn you that you might find flaws such as inactive profiles, insufficient matches, interface bugs, etc. Having said that, the overall experience is sure to leave you feeling content, provided you remain active and have the patience to keep searching.

You’ll notice that some of these sites are completely free while majority of them offer in-app purchases for premium features. We’d suggest that you upgrade only if you’re really going to use the app on a regular basis and can’t do without those features. Some of the most common features are seeing who viewed your profile, boosting your profile in suggested matches, erasing an accidental left-swipe, browsing unlimited members, etc.

In case we’ve skipped any sites that you think are worth a mention, do give us a shout out. Happy hooking!

The post 15 Best HookUp Sites That Work Like A Charm appeared first on Dreamy Tricks.

from Dreamy Tricks Click Here for full article

Google Play Store Rejects App For Using the Word “BitTorrent”

In recent years we’ve written several articles on Apple’s aversion to BitTorrent-related apps in the iOS store.

Until this day, no fully-featured torrent client has managed to get listed in the store, at least not permanently but Google Play has been more welcoming. The popular app store for Android devices has had a nice collection of BitTorrent apps for years, including several well-known brands.

Last weekend, however, the developers of the relatively new BitTorrent client BiglyBT learned that the term “BitTorrent” is no longer allowed. When they pushed an update of their app on Google Play they were informed that their description violated the metadata policy.

“I reviewed your app and had to reject it because it violates our metadata policy. The app’s full description mentions other brands: Bittorrent.”

Play Store rejection

Needless to say, the BiglyBT developers were astounded. The app is created by seasoned BitTorrent developers who previously worked on Azureus and Vuze. Since BitTorrent is the name of the transfer protocol their app is using, they expected no issues.

Initially, this wasn’t the case. When the app was first submitted, Google didn’t flag the description as problematic, but something apparently changed.

“Looks like either Google just newly considered ‘Bittorrent’ a brand, or Bittorrent Inc has decided to enforce their name. I guess it’s not good enough anymore that bittorrent is also the protocol name,” BiglyBT developer TuxPaper informed us.

It could indeed have been possible that BitTorrent Inc, which owns the relevant trademark in the US, had started to enforce it. However, that’s not the case. The San Francisco company informs TorrentFreak that they haven’t asked Google to take any action.

Interestingly, BitTorrent Inc.’s own uTorrent app also disappeared from Google’s app store for a few days last month, but it’s unclear to us why this was. The app eventually returned though, and there are also plenty of other apps with BitTorrent mentions on Google Play.

The good news for BiglyBT’s developers is that their app was allowed back on Google Play after they changed all “BitTorrent” mentions to “torrent.”

Google rejections can happen automatically or after a manual review. If the former applies in this case, other developers may face the same issue in the future.

“If it’s an automated one, then other Bittorrent Apps will also be getting this rejection the next time they update their app or play metadata,” TuxPaper notes.

TorrentFreak reached out to Google for a comment on the situation but a few days have passed without a reply. So for now, it remains a mystery why Google is taking action against “BitTorrent,” and on what grounds.

Source: TF, for the latest info on copyright, file-sharing, torrent sites and more. We also have VPN discounts, offers and coupons

from TorrentFreak Click Here for full article

1 2 3 16